Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes around multiple [patch] per crate #7303

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 27, 2019

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

This commit fixes a few bugs in handling of [patch] where multiple
version of the same crate name have been patched in. Two sub-issues were
discovered when investigating #7264:

  • The first issue is that the source of the assertion, the logic in
    lock, revealed a fundamental flaw in the logic. The lock function
    serves the purpose of applying a lock file to a dependency candidate
    and ensure that it stays within locked versions of dependencies, if
    they're previously found. The logic here to handle [patch], however,
    happened a bit too late and was a bit too zealous to simply lock a
    dependency by name instead of accounting for the version as well.

    The updated logic is to move the locking of dependencies here to
    during the normal iteration over the list of dependencies. Adjacent to
    matches_id we check matches_ignoring_source. If the latter returns
    true then we double-check that the previous dependency is still in
    [patch], and then we let it through. This means that patches with
    multiple versions should be correctly handled where edges drawn with
    [patch] are preserved.

  • The second issue, after fixing this, was found where if the exact same
    version was listed in [patch] multiple times then we would
    continuously update the original source since one of the replacements
    gets lost along the way. This commit adds a first-class warning
    disallowing patches pointing to the exact same crate version, since we
    don't have a way to prioritize amongst them anyway.

Closes #7264

@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @ehuss

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Aug 26, 2019
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 27, 2019

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #7263) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

tests/testsuite/patch.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/testsuite/patch.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/testsuite/patch.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/testsuite/patch.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ehuss
Copy link
Contributor

ehuss commented Aug 27, 2019

One more thing, can you add some documentation on LockedMap? Like what the different values are, and what its purpose is. It is a bit difficult to understand how all the locking works, and I think that would be a good place to start clarifying. For example, you have to read a lot of code just to understand what the tuple values are, or that the String key is a package name.

@alexcrichton alexcrichton force-pushed the duplicate-patch branch 2 times, most recently from a2f53db to 87e8024 Compare August 27, 2019 21:03
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

Ok I think that should cover everything, thanks for taking a look!

Definitely agreed that we should have internal documentation of how lock files work, as it's pretty subtle in how it actually ends up working!

@@ -79,7 +80,28 @@ pub struct PackageRegistry<'cfg> {
patches_available: HashMap<Url, Vec<PackageId>>,
}

type LockedMap = HashMap<SourceId, HashMap<String, Vec<(PackageId, Vec<PackageId>)>>>;
/// A map of all "locked packages" which is filled in when parsing a lock file
/// and is used to guide dependency resolution by altering summaires as they're
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
/// and is used to guide dependency resolution by altering summaires as they're
/// and is used to guide dependency resolution by altering summaries as they're

Thanks, r=me with typo fix.

This commit fixes a few bugs in handling of `[patch]` where multiple
version of the same crate name have been patched in. Two sub-issues were
discovered when investigating rust-lang#7264:

* The first issue is that the source of the assertion, the logic in
  `lock`, revealed a fundamental flaw in the logic. The `lock` function
  serves the purpose of applying a lock file to a dependency candidate
  and ensure that it stays within locked versions of dependencies, if
  they're previously found. The logic here to handle `[patch]`, however,
  happened a bit too late and was a bit too zealous to simply lock a
  dependency by name instead of accounting for the version as well.

  The updated logic is to move the locking of dependencies here to
  during the normal iteration over the list of dependencies. Adjacent to
  `matches_id` we check `matches_ignoring_source`. If the latter returns
  `true` then we double-check that the previous dependency is still in
  `[patch]`, and then we let it through. This means that patches with
  multiple versions should be correctly handled where edges drawn with
  `[patch]` are preserved.

* The second issue, after fixing this, was found where if the exact same
  version was listed in `[patch]` multiple times then we would
  continuously update the original source since one of the replacements
  gets lost along the way. This commit adds a first-class warning
  disallowing patches pointing to the exact same crate version, since we
  don't have a way to prioritize amongst them anyway.

Closes rust-lang#7264
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: r=ehuss

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 27, 2019

📌 Commit 803bf32 has been approved by ehuss

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 27, 2019
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 27, 2019

⌛ Testing commit 803bf32 with merge ba37dac...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2019
Fixes around multiple `[patch]` per crate

This commit fixes a few bugs in handling of `[patch]` where multiple
version of the same crate name have been patched in. Two sub-issues were
discovered when investigating #7264:

* The first issue is that the source of the assertion, the logic in
  `lock`, revealed a fundamental flaw in the logic. The `lock` function
  serves the purpose of applying a lock file to a dependency candidate
  and ensure that it stays within locked versions of dependencies, if
  they're previously found. The logic here to handle `[patch]`, however,
  happened a bit too late and was a bit too zealous to simply lock a
  dependency by name instead of accounting for the version as well.

  The updated logic is to move the locking of dependencies here to
  during the normal iteration over the list of dependencies. Adjacent to
  `matches_id` we check `matches_ignoring_source`. If the latter returns
  `true` then we double-check that the previous dependency is still in
  `[patch]`, and then we let it through. This means that patches with
  multiple versions should be correctly handled where edges drawn with
  `[patch]` are preserved.

* The second issue, after fixing this, was found where if the exact same
  version was listed in `[patch]` multiple times then we would
  continuously update the original source since one of the replacements
  gets lost along the way. This commit adds a first-class warning
  disallowing patches pointing to the exact same crate version, since we
  don't have a way to prioritize amongst them anyway.

Closes #7264
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 27, 2019

☀️ Test successful - checks-azure
Approved by: ehuss
Pushing ba37dac to master...

@bors bors merged commit 803bf32 into rust-lang:master Aug 27, 2019
bors added a commit to rust-lang/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2019
Update cargo, books

## cargo

8 commits in 22f7dd0495cd72ce2082d318d5a9b4dccb9c5b8c..fe0e5a48b75da2b405c8ce1ba2674e174ae11d5d
2019-08-27 16:10:51 +0000 to 2019-09-04 00:51:27 +0000
- Rename `--all` to `--workspace` (rust-lang/cargo#7241)
- Basic standard library support. (rust-lang/cargo#7216)
- Allow using 'config.toml' instead of just 'config' files. (rust-lang/cargo#7295)
- Retry on SSL Connect Error. (rust-lang/cargo#7318)
- minimal-copy `deserialize` for `InternedString` (rust-lang/cargo#7310)
- Fix typo in cargo vendor examples (rust-lang/cargo#7320)
- Fixes around multiple `[patch]` per crate (rust-lang/cargo#7303)
- Improve error messages on mkdir failure (rust-lang/cargo#7306)

## reference

7 commits in d191a0c..090c015
2019-08-15 08:42:23 +0200 to 2019-09-03 13:59:28 -0700
- Fix rust-lang/reference#664: Review Oxford comma usage. (rust-lang/reference#668)
- Fix some links. (rust-lang/reference#667)
- Remove trait object warning. (rust-lang/reference#666)
- Specify pattern types in `let` statements and `for` expressions (rust-lang/reference#663)
- Fix loop expression link. (rust-lang/reference#662)
- async-await initial reference material (rust-lang/reference#635)
- Correct errors in the reference of extern functions definitions and declarations (rust-lang/reference#652)

## rust-by-example

1 commits in 580839d90aacd537f0293697096fa8355bc4e673..e76be6b2dc84c6a992e186157efe29d625e29b94
2019-08-17 23:17:50 -0300 to 2019-09-03 07:42:26 -0300
- Change link to russian translation repository (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1245)

## embedded-book

1 commits in 432ca26686c11d396eed6a59499f93ce1bf2433c..5ca585c4a7552efb546e7681c3de0712f4ae4fdc
2019-08-09 23:20:22 +0000 to 2019-08-27 13:39:14 +0000
- Fixup book CI  (rust-embedded/book#205)
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the duplicate-patch branch September 16, 2019 18:24
@ehuss ehuss added this to the 1.39.0 milestone Feb 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[patch] with duplicate values causes panic
4 participants