Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 4 pull requests #111552

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
May 14, 2023
Merged

Rollup of 4 pull requests #111552

merged 9 commits into from
May 14, 2023

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

clubby789 and others added 9 commits May 11, 2023 21:41
Better diagnostics for `env!` where variable contains escape

Fixes rust-lang#110559
…mpiler-errors

better diagnostics for `impl<..> impl Trait for Type`

Fixes rust-lang#109963
…illaumeGomez

rustdoc-json: Add tests for `#![feature(inherent_associated_types)]`

Follow up to rust-lang#109410, CC `@fmease`

r? `@GuillaumeGomez`
…r=notriddle

[rustdoc] Convert more GUI tests colors to their original format

Follow-up of rust-lang#111459.

The update for the `browser-ui-test` version is about improvements for color handling (alpha for hex format in particular).

r? `@notriddle`
@rustbot rustbot added A-rustdoc-json Area: Rustdoc JSON backend A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels May 14, 2023
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=4

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 14, 2023

📌 Commit d1cd127 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 14, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 14, 2023

⌛ Testing commit d1cd127 with merge 0a0e045...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 14, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 0a0e045 to master...

1 similar comment
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 14, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 0a0e045 to master...

@bors bors added merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. labels May 14, 2023
@bors bors merged commit 0a0e045 into rust-lang:master May 14, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Perf Build Sha

previous master: 0a0e045e50

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.71.0 milestone May 14, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Perf Build Sha
#111549 0d921fa77fb369c72dd04a6b390eadb31df9804e
#111534 6347b8e5182fa60b3486e483d16ace92c7c0b0b9
#111477 dcf178ad9fb138f2c890b4ade02db148bd7f266f
#111463 b527480e2225148dd569dace4529c2b527dafd6d

previous master: bc888958c9

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (0a0e045): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.8% [2.1%, 3.7%] 6
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-4.4% [-5.1%, -4.1%] 3
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.0% [-2.0%, -2.0%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) -4.4% [-5.1%, -4.1%] 3

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
1.0% [0.7%, 1.3%] 4
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.6% [2.6%, 2.6%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 1.0% [0.7%, 1.3%] 4

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 660.613s -> 660.495s (-0.02%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-rustdoc-json Area: Rustdoc JSON backend A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants