Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rustbuild: Actually test musl on the musl bot #38498

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 21, 2016

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

A typo unfortunately meant that we haven't been testing musl for a bit, so now
it's time to discover if we accidentally introduced a regression!

A typo unfortunately meant that we haven't been testing musl for a bit, so now
it's time to discover if we accidentally introduced a regression!
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @aturon

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@brson
Copy link
Contributor

brson commented Dec 20, 2016

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 20, 2016

📌 Commit 49546cc has been approved by brson

alexcrichton added a commit to alexcrichton/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2016
…brson

rustbuild: Actually test musl on the musl bot

A typo unfortunately meant that we haven't been testing musl for a bit, so now
it's time to discover if we accidentally introduced a regression!
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2016
@bors bors merged commit 49546cc into rust-lang:master Dec 21, 2016
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the actually-test-musl branch December 27, 2016 06:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants