Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix typo in mutex.rs docs #40611

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 19, 2017
Merged

Fix typo in mutex.rs docs #40611

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 19, 2017

Conversation

ScottAbbey
Copy link
Contributor

This seems to match other uses of "be accessed" in the document.

This seems to match other uses of "be accessed" in the document.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @aturon (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@bors: r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 17, 2017

📌 Commit ec8ecf4 has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

frewsxcv added a commit to frewsxcv/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 17, 2017
Fix typo in mutex.rs docs

This seems to match other uses of "be accessed" in the document.
frewsxcv added a commit to frewsxcv/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 17, 2017
Fix typo in mutex.rs docs

This seems to match other uses of "be accessed" in the document.
frewsxcv added a commit to frewsxcv/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 17, 2017
Fix typo in mutex.rs docs

This seems to match other uses of "be accessed" in the document.
frewsxcv added a commit to frewsxcv/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2017
Fix typo in mutex.rs docs

This seems to match other uses of "be accessed" in the document.
frewsxcv added a commit to frewsxcv/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2017
Fix typo in mutex.rs docs

This seems to match other uses of "be accessed" in the document.
frewsxcv added a commit to frewsxcv/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2017
Fix typo in mutex.rs docs

This seems to match other uses of "be accessed" in the document.
frewsxcv added a commit to frewsxcv/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2017
Fix typo in mutex.rs docs

This seems to match other uses of "be accessed" in the document.
frewsxcv added a commit to frewsxcv/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2017
Fix typo in mutex.rs docs

This seems to match other uses of "be accessed" in the document.
arielb1 pushed a commit to arielb1/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2017
Fix typo in mutex.rs docs

This seems to match other uses of "be accessed" in the document.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2017
arielb1 pushed a commit to arielb1/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2017
Fix typo in mutex.rs docs

This seems to match other uses of "be accessed" in the document.
frewsxcv added a commit to frewsxcv/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2017
Fix typo in mutex.rs docs

This seems to match other uses of "be accessed" in the document.
frewsxcv added a commit to frewsxcv/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2017
Fix typo in mutex.rs docs

This seems to match other uses of "be accessed" in the document.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2017
Rollup of 13 pull requests

- Successful merges: #40441, #40445, #40562, #40564, #40583, #40588, #40589, #40590, #40603, #40611, #40621, #40646, #40648
- Failed merges:
@bors bors merged commit ec8ecf4 into rust-lang:master Mar 19, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants