Adjust warning of -C extra-filename with -o. #62128
Merged
+3
−3
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit 9d798b7 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 29, 2019
…thewjasper Adjust warning of -C extra-filename with -o. If `--emit` includes multiple unnamed outputs, and `-o` was specified, and `-C extra-filename` was specified, the compiler would warn that `-C extra-filename` was ignored, but this is not true. The "adapting" of the filenames includes the extra-filename info. Since this is a little convoluted and hard to follow, here is a little chart to summarize when running with `rustc foo.rs -o xyz -C extra-filename=asdf` `--emit` | Result ---------|-------- `link` | `xyz` (extra-filename ignored) `link,dep-info` | `xyzasdf`, `xyzasdf.d` (this PR removes the incorrect warning) As to whether or not this behavior is the best choice is another question.
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 29, 2019
…thewjasper Adjust warning of -C extra-filename with -o. If `--emit` includes multiple unnamed outputs, and `-o` was specified, and `-C extra-filename` was specified, the compiler would warn that `-C extra-filename` was ignored, but this is not true. The "adapting" of the filenames includes the extra-filename info. Since this is a little convoluted and hard to follow, here is a little chart to summarize when running with `rustc foo.rs -o xyz -C extra-filename=asdf` `--emit` | Result ---------|-------- `link` | `xyz` (extra-filename ignored) `link,dep-info` | `xyzasdf`, `xyzasdf.d` (this PR removes the incorrect warning) As to whether or not this behavior is the best choice is another question.
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 29, 2019
…thewjasper Adjust warning of -C extra-filename with -o. If `--emit` includes multiple unnamed outputs, and `-o` was specified, and `-C extra-filename` was specified, the compiler would warn that `-C extra-filename` was ignored, but this is not true. The "adapting" of the filenames includes the extra-filename info. Since this is a little convoluted and hard to follow, here is a little chart to summarize when running with `rustc foo.rs -o xyz -C extra-filename=asdf` `--emit` | Result ---------|-------- `link` | `xyz` (extra-filename ignored) `link,dep-info` | `xyzasdf`, `xyzasdf.d` (this PR removes the incorrect warning) As to whether or not this behavior is the best choice is another question.
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 1, 2019
…thewjasper Adjust warning of -C extra-filename with -o. If `--emit` includes multiple unnamed outputs, and `-o` was specified, and `-C extra-filename` was specified, the compiler would warn that `-C extra-filename` was ignored, but this is not true. The "adapting" of the filenames includes the extra-filename info. Since this is a little convoluted and hard to follow, here is a little chart to summarize when running with `rustc foo.rs -o xyz -C extra-filename=asdf` `--emit` | Result ---------|-------- `link` | `xyz` (extra-filename ignored) `link,dep-info` | `xyzasdf`, `xyzasdf.d` (this PR removes the incorrect warning) As to whether or not this behavior is the best choice is another question.
Mark-Simulacrum
added a commit
to Mark-Simulacrum/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 3, 2019
…thewjasper Adjust warning of -C extra-filename with -o. If `--emit` includes multiple unnamed outputs, and `-o` was specified, and `-C extra-filename` was specified, the compiler would warn that `-C extra-filename` was ignored, but this is not true. The "adapting" of the filenames includes the extra-filename info. Since this is a little convoluted and hard to follow, here is a little chart to summarize when running with `rustc foo.rs -o xyz -C extra-filename=asdf` `--emit` | Result ---------|-------- `link` | `xyz` (extra-filename ignored) `link,dep-info` | `xyzasdf`, `xyzasdf.d` (this PR removes the incorrect warning) As to whether or not this behavior is the best choice is another question.
Mark-Simulacrum
added a commit
to Mark-Simulacrum/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 3, 2019
…thewjasper Adjust warning of -C extra-filename with -o. If `--emit` includes multiple unnamed outputs, and `-o` was specified, and `-C extra-filename` was specified, the compiler would warn that `-C extra-filename` was ignored, but this is not true. The "adapting" of the filenames includes the extra-filename info. Since this is a little convoluted and hard to follow, here is a little chart to summarize when running with `rustc foo.rs -o xyz -C extra-filename=asdf` `--emit` | Result ---------|-------- `link` | `xyz` (extra-filename ignored) `link,dep-info` | `xyzasdf`, `xyzasdf.d` (this PR removes the incorrect warning) As to whether or not this behavior is the best choice is another question.
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 3, 2019
Rollup of 15 pull requests Successful merges: - #62021 (MSVC link output improve) - #62064 (nth_back for chunks_exact) - #62128 (Adjust warning of -C extra-filename with -o.) - #62161 (Add missing links for TryFrom docs) - #62183 (std: Move a process test out of libstd) - #62186 (Add missing type urls in Into trait) - #62196 (Add Vec::leak) - #62199 (import gdb for explicit access to gdb.current_objfile()) - #62229 (Enable intptrcast for explicit casts) - #62250 (Improve box clone doctests to ensure the documentation is valid) - #62255 (Switch tracking issue for `#![feature(slice_patterns)]`) - #62285 (Fix michaelwoerister's mailmap) - #62304 (HashMap is UnwindSafe) - #62319 (Fix mismatching Kleene operators) - #62327 (Fixed document bug, those replaced each other) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If
--emitincludes multiple unnamed outputs, and-owas specified, and-C extra-filenamewas specified, the compiler would warn that-C extra-filenamewas ignored, but this is not true. The "adapting" of the filenames includes the extra-filename info.Since this is a little convoluted and hard to follow, here is a little chart to summarize when running with
rustc foo.rs -o xyz -C extra-filename=asdf--emitlinkxyz(extra-filename ignored)link,dep-infoxyzasdf,xyzasdf.d(this PR removes the incorrect warning)As to whether or not this behavior is the best choice is another question.