-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 12 pull requests #62271
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 12 pull requests #62271
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This also adds assertions that the operations work as expected.
Since switching CI to Azure Pipelines it seems that this test seems to fail more consistently, so let's disable that for now. It helps that we have less than a week before release - we disallow PRs that break the tools to land in this period, so this makes landing critical PRs smoother now. r? @alexcrichton
Unreserve `macro_rules` as a macro name
…r=alexcrichton MSVC link output improve Resolves rust-lang#35785. However i haven't come up with a idea to add test case for this :( r? @retep998
…thewjasper Adjust warning of -C extra-filename with -o. If `--emit` includes multiple unnamed outputs, and `-o` was specified, and `-C extra-filename` was specified, the compiler would warn that `-C extra-filename` was ignored, but this is not true. The "adapting" of the filenames includes the extra-filename info. Since this is a little convoluted and hard to follow, here is a little chart to summarize when running with `rustc foo.rs -o xyz -C extra-filename=asdf` `--emit` | Result ---------|-------- `link` | `xyz` (extra-filename ignored) `link,dep-info` | `xyzasdf`, `xyzasdf.d` (this PR removes the incorrect warning) As to whether or not this behavior is the best choice is another question.
Feature gate `rustc` attributes harder Fixes rust-lang#62116
…links, r=docs Add missing links for TryFrom docs r? @rust-lang/docs
…ks-into, r=docs Add missing type urls in Into trait r? @rust-lang/docs
…-casts, r=RalfJung Enable intptrcast for explicit casts I checked locally that this does not break miri on master. r? @RalfJung
…, r=GuillaumeGomez Improve box clone doctests to ensure the documentation is valid
…mple, r=dtolnay Update mem::replace example to not be identical to mem::take This also adds assertions that the operations work as expected.
…, r=varkor Switch tracking issue for `#![feature(slice_patterns)]` Switches the tracking issue for `#![feature(slice_patterns)]` to a fresh one in rust-lang#62254 due to new RFCs. Closes rust-lang#23121. r? @varkor
syntax: Unsupport `foo! bar { ... }` macros in the parser Their support in expansion was removed in rust-lang#61606. Also un-reserve `macro_rules` as a macro name, there's no ambiguity between `macro_rules` definitions and macro calls (it also wasn't reserved correctly). cc rust-lang/wg-grammar#51
Update RLS to disable spurious client_find_definitions test Since switching CI to Azure Pipelines it seems that this test seems to fail more consistently, so let's disable that for now. It helps that we have less than a week before release - we disallow PRs that break the tools to land in this period, so this makes landing critical PRs smoother now. r? @alexcrichton
Clean up inherent_impls Split out from rust-lang#61923. r? @eddyb
@bors r+ p=12 rollup=never |
📌 Commit 0783a2d has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Jul 1, 2019
FYI #62259 does not need to land anymore. |
⌛ Testing commit 0783a2d with merge 25571d35772daf2a23fc47beff25f05a23071c07... |
💔 Test failed - checks-azure |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Jul 2, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
rustc
attributes harder #62133 (Feature gaterustc
attributes harder)#![feature(slice_patterns)]
#62255 (Switch tracking issue for#![feature(slice_patterns)]
)foo! bar { ... }
macros in the parser #62258 (syntax: Unsupportfoo! bar { ... }
macros in the parser)Failed merges:
r? @ghost