Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove DeclareMethods #76872

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 21, 2020
Merged

Conversation

khyperia
Copy link
Contributor

Most of the DeclareMethods API was only used internally by rustc_codegen_llvm. As such, it makes no sense to require other backends to implement them.

(get_declared_value and declare_cfn were used, in one place, specific to the main symbol, which I've replaced with a more specialized function to allow more flexibility in implementation - the intent is that declare_c_main can go away once we do something more clever, e.g. @eddyb has ideas around having a MIR shim or somesuch we can explore in a follow-up PR)

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @petrochenkov

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 18, 2020
@eddyb
Copy link
Member

eddyb commented Sep 18, 2020

@bors r+ Thanks!

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 18, 2020

📌 Commit 0bc405e has been approved by eddyb

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 18, 2020
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

r? @eddyb

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned eddyb and unassigned petrochenkov Sep 19, 2020
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2020
…eddyb

Remove DeclareMethods

Most of the `DeclareMethods` API was only used internally by rustc_codegen_llvm. As such, it makes no sense to require other backends to implement them.

(`get_declared_value` and `declare_cfn` were used, in one place, specific to the `main` symbol, which I've replaced with a more specialized function to allow more flexibility in implementation - the intent is that `declare_c_main` can go away once we do something more clever, e.g. @eddyb has ideas around having a MIR shim or somesuch we can explore in a follow-up PR)
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2020
…eddyb

Remove DeclareMethods

Most of the `DeclareMethods` API was only used internally by rustc_codegen_llvm. As such, it makes no sense to require other backends to implement them.

(`get_declared_value` and `declare_cfn` were used, in one place, specific to the `main` symbol, which I've replaced with a more specialized function to allow more flexibility in implementation - the intent is that `declare_c_main` can go away once we do something more clever, e.g. @eddyb has ideas around having a MIR shim or somesuch we can explore in a follow-up PR)
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2020
…eddyb

Remove DeclareMethods

Most of the `DeclareMethods` API was only used internally by rustc_codegen_llvm. As such, it makes no sense to require other backends to implement them.

(`get_declared_value` and `declare_cfn` were used, in one place, specific to the `main` symbol, which I've replaced with a more specialized function to allow more flexibility in implementation - the intent is that `declare_c_main` can go away once we do something more clever, e.g. @eddyb has ideas around having a MIR shim or somesuch we can explore in a follow-up PR)
RalfJung added a commit to RalfJung/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 21, 2020
…eddyb

Remove DeclareMethods

Most of the `DeclareMethods` API was only used internally by rustc_codegen_llvm. As such, it makes no sense to require other backends to implement them.

(`get_declared_value` and `declare_cfn` were used, in one place, specific to the `main` symbol, which I've replaced with a more specialized function to allow more flexibility in implementation - the intent is that `declare_c_main` can go away once we do something more clever, e.g. @eddyb has ideas around having a MIR shim or somesuch we can explore in a follow-up PR)
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 21, 2020
Rollup of 13 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#76135 (Stabilize some Option methods as const)
 - rust-lang#76628 (Add sample defaults for config.toml )
 - rust-lang#76846 (Avoiding unnecesary allocations at rustc_errors)
 - rust-lang#76867 (Use intra-doc links in core/src/iter when possible)
 - rust-lang#76868 (Finish moving to intra doc links for std::sync)
 - rust-lang#76872 (Remove DeclareMethods)
 - rust-lang#76936 (Add non-`unsafe` `.get_mut()` for `Unsafecell`)
 - rust-lang#76958 (Replace manual as_nanos and as_secs_f64 reimplementations)
 - rust-lang#76959 (Replace write_fmt with write!)
 - rust-lang#76961 (Add test for issue rust-lang#34634)
 - rust-lang#76962 (Use const_cstr macro in consts.rs)
 - rust-lang#76963 (Remove unused static_assert macro)
 - rust-lang#77000 (update Miri)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
@bors bors merged commit 02d787b into rust-lang:master Sep 21, 2020
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.48.0 milestone Sep 21, 2020
@khyperia khyperia deleted the remove_declare_methods branch October 23, 2022 10:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants