-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 482
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ModulesWithBasis.ParentMethods.cardinality() for 0 dimensional modules #36985
Merged
vbraun
merged 1 commit into
sagemath:develop
from
tscrim:categories/modules_with_basis_cardinality
Jan 14, 2024
Merged
ModulesWithBasis.ParentMethods.cardinality() for 0 dimensional modules #36985
vbraun
merged 1 commit into
sagemath:develop
from
tscrim:categories/modules_with_basis_cardinality
Jan 14, 2024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
5 tasks
Documentation preview for this PR (built with commit 23bef33; changes) is ready! 🎉 |
darijgr
approved these changes
Jan 1, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me! Simplest review ever.
Thank you! |
vbraun
pushed a commit
to vbraun/sage
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 2, 2024
…dimensional modules <!-- ^^^^^ Please provide a concise, informative and self-explanatory title. Don't put issue numbers in there, do this in the PR body below. For example, instead of "Fixes sagemath#1234" use "Introduce new method to calculate 1+1" --> <!-- Describe your changes here in detail --> Currently this is not handled properly as $\infty^0$ is not well-defined but we know a 0 dimensional free module is $\\{0\\}$ with one element. <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? --> <!-- If this PR resolves an open issue, please link to it here. For example "Fixes sagemath#12345". --> <!-- If your change requires a documentation PR, please link it appropriately. --> ### 📝 Checklist <!-- Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. --> <!-- If your change requires a documentation PR, please link it appropriately --> <!-- If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> <!-- Feel free to remove irrelevant items. --> - [x] The title is concise, informative, and self-explanatory. - [x] The description explains in detail what this PR is about. - [x] I have linked a relevant issue or discussion. - [x] I have created tests covering the changes. - [x] I have updated the documentation accordingly. ### ⌛ Dependencies <!-- List all open PRs that this PR logically depends on - sagemath#12345: short description why this is a dependency - sagemath#34567: ... --> <!-- If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> URL: sagemath#36985 Reported by: Travis Scrimshaw Reviewer(s): Darij Grinberg
vbraun
pushed a commit
to vbraun/sage
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 5, 2024
…dimensional modules <!-- ^^^^^ Please provide a concise, informative and self-explanatory title. Don't put issue numbers in there, do this in the PR body below. For example, instead of "Fixes sagemath#1234" use "Introduce new method to calculate 1+1" --> <!-- Describe your changes here in detail --> Currently this is not handled properly as $\infty^0$ is not well-defined but we know a 0 dimensional free module is $\\{0\\}$ with one element. <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? --> <!-- If this PR resolves an open issue, please link to it here. For example "Fixes sagemath#12345". --> <!-- If your change requires a documentation PR, please link it appropriately. --> ### 📝 Checklist <!-- Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. --> <!-- If your change requires a documentation PR, please link it appropriately --> <!-- If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> <!-- Feel free to remove irrelevant items. --> - [x] The title is concise, informative, and self-explanatory. - [x] The description explains in detail what this PR is about. - [x] I have linked a relevant issue or discussion. - [x] I have created tests covering the changes. - [x] I have updated the documentation accordingly. ### ⌛ Dependencies <!-- List all open PRs that this PR logically depends on - sagemath#12345: short description why this is a dependency - sagemath#34567: ... --> <!-- If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> URL: sagemath#36985 Reported by: Travis Scrimshaw Reviewer(s): Darij Grinberg
vbraun
pushed a commit
to vbraun/sage
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 24, 2024
<!-- ^^^^^ Please provide a concise, informative and self-explanatory title. Don't put issue numbers in there, do this in the PR body below. For example, instead of "Fixes sagemath#1234" use "Introduce new method to calculate 1+1" --> <!-- Describe your changes here in detail --> This provides an implementation of the Specht modules over arbitrary fields in the standard tableaux basis. To do so, we also implement the tabloid module, where the tabloids are implemented as `OrderedSetsPartitions`. Using this, we can construct the maximal submodule and simple submodule from a Specht module. We also implement a method to compute the Brauer character of the representations. <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? --> <!-- If this PR resolves an open issue, please link to it here. For example "Fixes sagemath#12345". --> <!-- If your change requires a documentation PR, please link it appropriately. --> ### 📝 Checklist <!-- Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. --> <!-- If your change requires a documentation PR, please link it appropriately --> <!-- If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> <!-- Feel free to remove irrelevant items. --> - [x] The title is concise, informative, and self-explanatory. - [x] The description explains in detail what this PR is about. - [x] I have linked a relevant issue or discussion. - [x] I have created tests covering the changes. - [x] I have updated the documentation accordingly. ### ⌛ Dependencies <!-- List all open PRs that this PR logically depends on - sagemath#12345: short description why this is a dependency - sagemath#34567: ... --> - sagemath#36724: Trivial conflict with working on the same files. - sagemath#36985: So the 0 dimensional tests will pass. <!-- If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> URL: sagemath#36748 Reported by: Travis Scrimshaw Reviewer(s): Darij Grinberg, Frédéric Chapoton, Martin Rubey, Travis Scrimshaw
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently this is not handled properly as$\infty^0$ is not well-defined but we know a 0 dimensional free module is $\{0\}$ with one element.
📝 Checklist
⌛ Dependencies