Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[#253] Selectable via slot #271

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 11, 2023
Merged

[#253] Selectable via slot #271

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 11, 2023

Conversation

serebrov
Copy link
Owner

@serebrov serebrov commented Jun 10, 2023

[#253] Selectable via slot

Prototype selectable picker using custom slot (much simpler then #268, same result).

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jun 10, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #271 (01c6815) into master (6b62180) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the Github App Integration for your organization. Read more.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #271   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.42%   89.42%           
=======================================
  Files          15       15           
  Lines         577      577           
  Branches      143      143           
=======================================
  Hits          516      516           
  Misses         55       55           
  Partials        6        6           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/components/Picker.vue 100.00% <ø> (ø)

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@serebrov serebrov merged commit f80207e into master Jun 11, 2023
@serebrov serebrov deleted the 253-selectable-via-slot branch June 11, 2023 01:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants