Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create solid-team.md #1

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

Create solid-team.md #1

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

Mitzi-Laszlo
Copy link
Contributor

Collected all information from previous pull requests and .md files in solid/information. To be merged by the Solid Leader.

Collected all information from previous pull requests and .md files in solid/information. To be merged by the Solid Leader.
Incorporated Justin's concrete suggestions and comments from the conversation on the pull request as well as W3C meetings. 

Removed check and balances to be re-introduced when there are 1000 Solid Community Members 

In exceptional circumstances, it may be necessary to remove someone from the Solid Team against their will. (For example: egregious and ongoing code of conduct violations.) This can be accomplished by a Solid Community vote, but unlike other votes, this requires at least a two-thirds majority.

A no-confidence vote is triggered when a Solid Community member calls for one publically on an appropriate project communication channel, and ten other Solid Panel members second the proposal. The vote lasts for two weeks. Solid Panel members vote for or against. If at least two thirds of voters express a lack of confidence, then the vote succeeds.

There are two forms of no-confidence votes: those targeting a single member, and those targeting the Solid Team as a whole. The initial call for a no-confidence vote must specify which type is intended. If a single-member vote succeeds, then that member is removed from the Solid Team and the resulting vacancy can be handled in the usual way. If a whole-Solid Team vote succeeds, the Solid Team is dissolved and a new Solid Team election is triggered immediately.

## Conflicts of Interest

Solid Team members are trusted to act in the best interests of Solid rather than themselves or their employers, the mere appearance of any one company dominating Solid development could itself be harmful and erode trust. In order to avoid any appearance of conflict of interest, at most 2 members of the Solid Team can work for any single employer. This does not apply for the first appointment of the first Solid Team because there is a single dominant employer working on Solid at the time. 

In a Solid Team election, if 3 of the top 5 vote-getters work for the same employer, then whichever of them ranked lowest is disqualified and the 6th-ranking candidate moves up into 5th place; this is repeated until a valid Solid Team is formed.

During a Solid Team term, if changing circumstances cause this rule to be broken (for instance, due to a Solid Team member changing employment), then one or more Solid Team members must resign to remedy the issue, and the resulting vacancies can then be filled as normal election.
@Mitzi-Laszlo
Copy link
Contributor Author

Will close this as the content as moved to new proposal that @justinwb and I wrote together with input from others that is lighter midway version.

justinwb pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2020
modify panel submission and chair process
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant