Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[202305] [Mellanox] enlarge the eeprom ready timeout from 20 to 60 (#18983) #19728

Merged

Conversation

Junchao-Mellanox
Copy link
Collaborator

@Junchao-Mellanox Junchao-Mellanox commented Jul 29, 2024

Backport PR #18983 to 202305

Why I did it

Service like ZTP accesses EEPROM very early at the boot stage. It could cause an issue that EEPROM is not ready. The PR enlarge EEPROM ready timeout from 20s to 60s.

Work item tracking
  • Microsoft ADO (number only):

How I did it

Enlarge EEPROM ready timeout from 20s to 60s.

How to verify it

Manual test

Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

  • 201811
  • 201911
  • 202006
  • 202012
  • 202106
  • 202111
  • 202205
  • 202211
  • 202305
  • 202311

Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)

Description for the changelog

Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes

A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

…18983)

- Why I did it
Service like ZTP accesses EEPROM very early at the boot stage. It could cause an issue that EEPROM is not ready. The PR enlarge EEPROM ready timeout from 20s to 60s.

- How I did it
Enlarge EEPROM ready timeout from 20s to 60s.

- How to verify it
Manual test
@Junchao-Mellanox
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hi @StormLiangMS , could you please help merge?

@yxieca yxieca requested a review from StormLiangMS July 29, 2024 16:22
Copy link
Contributor

@StormLiangMS StormLiangMS left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@StormLiangMS StormLiangMS merged commit 32d2ef3 into sonic-net:202305 Aug 2, 2024
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants