Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do not skip TestBatchResolveLocks for unistore #807

Merged

Conversation

MyonKeminta
Copy link
Contributor

@MyonKeminta MyonKeminta commented May 17, 2023

Ref: pingcap/tidb#43243

As merging the PR #777 updates the TiDB referenced by intergration tests which then includes the change pingcap/tidb#43397 , the test TestBatchResolveLocks now can successfully run on unistore, whose implementation of ScanLock has been fixed.

@disksing disksing merged commit d1e188a into tikv:master May 18, 2023
@MyonKeminta MyonKeminta deleted the m/batch-resolve-lock-test-on-unistore branch May 19, 2023 02:17
iosmanthus added a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2023
Co-authored-by: MyonKeminta <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: disksing <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: MyonKeminta <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Violin <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Smilencer <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: you06 <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Hu# <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Connor <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: zyguan <[email protected]>
fix case typo in comment. (#778)
fix goroutine leak (#784)
fix TestRURuntimeStatsCleanUp (#787)
Fix wrong resource group name for some requests (#788)
resolver: support verifying primary for check_txn_status (#777)
resolver: handle pessimistic locks in BatchResolveLocks (#794)
resolved ts  (#793)
ResolveLocks for unistore (#807)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants