-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 99
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Lldp lshw upload status #123
Changes from all commits
2c2cbbc
b64a44c
3951376
c030b61
e380285
8b6d621
f02af2b
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -90,23 +90,17 @@ object AssetLifecycle { | |
} | ||
|
||
def updateAsset(asset: Asset, options: Map[String,String]): Status[Boolean] = asset.isServerNode match { | ||
case true => updateServer(asset, options) | ||
case false => updateOther(asset, options) | ||
} | ||
|
||
protected def updateOther(asset: Asset, options: Map[String,String]): Status[Boolean] = { | ||
updateAssetAttributes(asset, options) | ||
case true => updateServer(asset, options) | ||
case false => updateAssetAttributes(asset, options) | ||
} | ||
|
||
protected def updateServer(asset: Asset, options: Map[String,String]): Status[Boolean] = { | ||
if (asset.isIncomplete) { | ||
updateIncompleteServer(asset, options) | ||
} else if (asset.isNew) { | ||
updateNewServer(asset, options) | ||
} else if (asset.isMaintenance) { | ||
updateMaintenanceServer(asset, options) | ||
} else { | ||
Left(new Exception("Only updates for Incomplete, New, and Maintenance servers are currently supported")) | ||
updateServerHardwareMeta(asset, options) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
|
@@ -155,6 +149,31 @@ object AssetLifecycle { | |
}.left.map(e => handleException(asset, "Error updating status/state for asset", e)) | ||
} | ||
|
||
protected def updateServerHardwareMeta(asset: Asset, options: Map[String,String]): Status[Boolean] = { | ||
// if asset's status is in the allowed statuses for updating, do it | ||
if (Feature.allowedServerUpdateStatuses.contains(asset.getStatus())) { | ||
// we will allow updates to lshw/lldp while the machine is in these statuses | ||
allCatch[Boolean].either { | ||
Asset.inTransaction { | ||
options.get("lshw").foreach{lshw => | ||
parseLshw(asset, new LshwParser(lshw)).left.foreach{throw _} | ||
InternalTattler.informational(asset, None, "Parsing and storing LSHW data succeeded") | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. nice use of the tattler |
||
} | ||
options.get("lldp").foreach{lldp => | ||
parseLldp(asset, new LldpParser(lldp)).left.foreach{throw _} | ||
InternalTattler.informational(asset, None, "Parsing and storing LLDP data succeeded") | ||
} | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @byxorna this should also support updating the There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. roger. |
||
options.get("CHASSIS_TAG").foreach{chassis_tag => | ||
MetaWrapper.createMeta(asset, Map(AssetMeta.Enum.ChassisTag.toString -> chassis_tag)) | ||
} | ||
true | ||
} | ||
}.left.map(e => handleException(asset, "Exception updating asset", e)) | ||
} else { | ||
Left(new Exception("Only updates for servers in statuses " + Feature.allowedServerUpdateStatuses.mkString(", ") + " are currently supported")) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
protected def updateNewServer(asset: Asset, options: Map[String,String]): Status[Boolean] = { | ||
val units = PowerUnits() | ||
val requiredKeys = Set(RackPosition.toString) ++ PowerUnits.keys(units) | ||
|
@@ -217,30 +236,7 @@ object AssetLifecycle { | |
MetaWrapper.createMeta(asset, filtered ++ Map(AssetMeta.Enum.ChassisTag.toString -> chassis_tag)) | ||
val newAsset = asset.copy(status = Status.New.map(_.id).getOrElse(0), updated = Some(new Date().asTimestamp)) | ||
Asset.partialUpdate(newAsset, newAsset.updated, Some(newAsset.status), State.New) | ||
InternalTattler.informational(newAsset, None, "Parsing and storing LSHW data succeeded") | ||
true | ||
} | ||
}.left.map(e => handleException(asset, "Exception updating asset", e)) | ||
} | ||
|
||
protected def updateMaintenanceServer(asset: Asset, options: Map[String, String]): Status[Boolean] = { | ||
//only lshw,lldp, and chasis tag can be updated in maintenance mode, at least one must be present | ||
val allowedKeys = Set("lshw", "lldp", "CHASSIS_TAG") | ||
if (allowedKeys.find{key => options.contains(key)} == None) { | ||
return Left(new Exception("At least one of " + allowedKeys.mkString(",") + " required")) | ||
} | ||
|
||
allCatch[Boolean].either { | ||
Asset.inTransaction { | ||
options.get("lshw").foreach{lshw => | ||
parseLshw(asset, new LshwParser(lshw)).left.foreach{throw _} | ||
} | ||
options.get("lldp").foreach{lldp => | ||
parseLldp(asset, new LldpParser(lldp)).left.foreach{throw _} | ||
} | ||
options.get("CHASSIS_TAG").foreach{chassis_tag => | ||
MetaWrapper.createMeta(asset, Map(AssetMeta.Enum.ChassisTag.toString -> chassis_tag)) | ||
} | ||
InternalTattler.informational(newAsset, None, "Parsing and storing LSHW/LLDP data succeeded") | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @byxorna good catch |
||
true | ||
} | ||
}.left.map(e => handleException(asset, "Exception updating asset", e)) | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Call me crazy - is this just a cosmetic change? Did you actually change any functionality here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No functionality change. Just did it out of OCD. I can revert this change if you would like, as it is not necessary.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, I totally understand OCD / having consistent, clearer code. I just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing a subtle diff. Leave it.