Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add additional topics to rosbag2 qos overrides #2454

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 1, 2024

Conversation

adev4a
Copy link
Contributor

@adev4a adev4a commented Nov 1, 2024

PR Details

Add additional topics to rosbag2 qos override to define transient_local subscribers for topics that might be published before rosbag recording process in running.

Description

Related GitHub Issue

Related Jira Key

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Types of changes

  • Defect fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • I have added any new packages to the sonar-scanner.properties file
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

@adev4a adev4a self-assigned this Nov 1, 2024
@adev4a adev4a requested a review from MishkaMN November 1, 2024 18:14
MishkaMN
MishkaMN previously approved these changes Nov 1, 2024
history: keep_all
reliability: reliable
durability: transient_local
depth: 1
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: depth is not used for keep_all we can safely remove them

@MishkaMN MishkaMN merged commit 0a5689b into develop Nov 1, 2024
3 checks passed
@MishkaMN MishkaMN deleted the feature/update-rosbag2-overrides branch November 1, 2024 18:30
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Nov 1, 2024

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants