replace check_eq with dcheck_eq.

[xtcyclist]

What type of PR is this?

• bug
• feature
• enhancement

What problem(s) does this PR solve?

Issue(s) number:

#4971

Description:

CHECK_EQ may crash the service in online environments. DCHECK_EQ is sufficient for testing purposes as a checker.

How do you solve it?

Replaced all CHECK_EQ with DCHECK_EQ.

Special notes for your reviewer, ex. impact of this fix, design document, etc:

Checklist:

Tests:

• Unit test(positive and negative cases)
• Function test
• Performance test
• N/A

Affects:

• Documentation affected (Please add the label if documentation needs to be modified.)
• Incompatibility (If it breaks the compatibility, please describe it and add the label.）
• If it's needed to cherry-pick (If cherry-pick to some branches is required, please label the destination version(s).)
• Performance impacted: Consumes more CPU/Memory

Release notes:

Please confirm whether to be reflected in release notes and how to describe:

ex. Fixed the bug .....