Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace use of "@Rule ExpectedException" with new Throws matcher introduced in cactoos-matchers 0.13 #1023

Closed
fabriciofx opened this issue Jan 18, 2019 · 16 comments

Comments

@fabriciofx
Copy link
Contributor

Let's update do cactoos-matchers 0.13. This update is necessary to use Throws class to avoid exception rule at tests.

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Jan 18, 2019

@llorllale/z please, pay attention to this issue

@fabriciofx fabriciofx changed the title Update to cactoos-matchers 0.13 Update cactoos-matchers to 0.13 Jan 18, 2019
@llorllale
Copy link
Contributor

@fabriciofx please update title and description to "Replace use of "@rule ExpectedException" with new Throws matcher introduced in cactoos-matchers 0.13"

@fabriciofx fabriciofx changed the title Update cactoos-matchers to 0.13 Replace use of "@rule ExpectedException" with new Throws matcher introduced in cactoos-matchers 0.13 Jan 18, 2019
@fabriciofx
Copy link
Contributor Author

@llorllale done.

@fabriciofx fabriciofx changed the title Replace use of "@rule ExpectedException" with new Throws matcher introduced in cactoos-matchers 0.13 Replace use of "@Rule ExpectedException" with new Throws matcher introduced in cactoos-matchers 0.13 Jan 18, 2019
@llorllale
Copy link
Contributor

@0crat in

@0crat 0crat added the scope label Jan 18, 2019
@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Jan 18, 2019

@0crat in (here)

@llorllale Job #1023 is now in scope, role is DEV

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Jan 18, 2019

Bug was reported, see §29: +15 point(s) just awarded to @fabriciofx/z

@BinaryIgor
Copy link
Contributor

@llorllale Could you assign me?

@llorllale
Copy link
Contributor

@0crat assign @Iprogrammerr

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Jan 19, 2019

@0crat assign @Iprogrammerr (here)

@llorllale The job #1023 assigned to @iprogrammerr/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be no monetary reward for this job

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Jan 19, 2019

Manual assignment of issues is discouraged, see §19: -5 point(s) just awarded to @llorllale/z

@0pdd
Copy link
Collaborator

0pdd commented Jan 23, 2019

@fabriciofx the puzzle #1039 is still not solved.

@fabriciofx
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closed by #1027.

@0crat 0crat removed the scope label Jan 24, 2019
@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Jan 24, 2019

The job #1023 is now out of scope

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Jan 24, 2019

Order was finished: +30 point(s) just awarded to @iprogrammerr/z

@0pdd
Copy link
Collaborator

0pdd commented Apr 15, 2019

@fabriciofx the puzzle #1106 is still not solved; solved: #1039.

@0pdd
Copy link
Collaborator

0pdd commented Oct 2, 2019

@fabriciofx all 2 puzzles are solved here: #1039, #1106.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants