AsyncFunc.java:48-52: Avoid usage of null value in...

[0pdd]

The puzzle 861-7a51e9e5 from #861 has to be resolved:

cactoos/src/main/java/org/cactoos/func/AsyncFunc.java

Lines 48 to 52 in 9662238

	* @todo #861:30min Avoid usage of null value in ctor(Proc, ExecutorService),
	* ctor(Proc, ThreadFactory) and ctor(Proc) which is against design
	* principles.
	* Perhaps with a creation of AsyncProc or removal of this functionality?
	* Please take a look on #551 and #843 for more details.

The puzzle was created by Isammoc OFF on 16-May-18.

Estimate: 30 minutes,

If you have any technical questions, don't ask me, submit new tickets instead. The task will be "done" when the problem is fixed and the text of the puzzle is removed from the source code. Here is more about PDD and about me.

[0crat]

@llorllale/z please, pay attention to this issue

[0crat]

Job #884 is now in scope, role is DEV

[0crat]

The job #884 assigned to @jsoroka/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be no monetary reward for this job

[0crat]

@jsoroka/z this job was assigned to you 5days ago. It will be taken away from you soon, unless you close it, see §8. Read this and this, please.

[0crat]

The job #884 assigned to @ammaratef45/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be no monetary reward for this job

[ammaratef45]

@llorllale
I noticed that the name of the class changed from AsyncFunc to Async,
I see in #551 @SharplEr made another FunOf that doesn't take a result as a parameter, why this solution isn't there? I see it was accepted by the reviewer at the end

[llorllale]

@ammaratef45 provide link please

[ammaratef45]

@llorllale
SharplEr@1f687cf
This is one of his commits,
The whole discussion is at #551 too

[llorllale]

@ammaratef45 he left a puzzle precisely to remove that ctor in a later PR

[ammaratef45]

@llorllale Yes, but his code isn't I the master branch, should I switch to another branch or reimplement his changes?

[ammaratef45]

@llorllale @0crat
waiting for clarification

[0crat]

Are you speaking to me or about me here; you must always start your message with my name if you want to address it to me, see §1

[ammaratef45]

@0crat waiting

[0crat]

@0crat waiting (here)

@ammaratef45 Job #884 is not assigned, can't put it on hold

[llorllale]

@ammaratef45 what code is it that you're not seeing in the master branch? The PR you referenced to earlier was merged [to the master branch].

[g4s8]

@0crat status

[0crat]

@0crat status (here)

@g4s8 This is what I know about this job in C63314D6Z, as in §32:

• The job #884 is in scope for 8mon
• The role is DEV
• The job is not assigned to anyone
• The budget is not set yet
• These users are banned and won't be assigned:
  • @0pdd/z: This user reported the ticket
  • @jsoroka/z: User was resigned from the ticket
  • @ammaratef45/z: User was resigned from the ticket
• Job footprint (restricted area)

[0crat]

The job #884 assigned to @marceloamadeu/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be no monetary reward for this job

[marceloamadeu]

@0crat wait

[0crat]

@0crat wait (here)

@marceloamadeu Job #884 is already on hold

[marceloamadeu]

@0crat refuse

[0crat]

@0crat refuse (here)

@marceloamadeu The user @marceloamadeu/z resigned from #884, please stop working. Reason for job resignation: Order was cancelled

[0crat]

Tasks refusal is discouraged, see §6: -15 point(s) just awarded to @marceloamadeu/z

[0crat]

The job #884 assigned to @victornoel/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be no monetary reward for this job

[victornoel]

@0crat waiting for #1068 to be merged

[0crat]

@0crat waiting for #1068 to be merged (here)

@victornoel The impediment for #884 was registered successfully by @victornoel/z

[0pdd]

The puzzle 861-7a51e9e5 has disappeared from the source code, that's why I closed this issue.

[0crat]

The job #884 is now out of scope

[0crat]

Order was finished: +30 point(s) just awarded to @victornoel/z