Static inner classes should be qualified with outer class always

[krzyk]

Static inner classes declared in given class and used in it should be qualified if the class name.

Right now qulice doesn't complain about such cases, but it should:

public class Foo {

    public void method(int num) {
        new Bar(num);
    }

    private static final class Bar {
        private final num;

        Bar(int num) {
            this.num = num;
        }
    }
}

Qulice should complain in method() line with new Bar(num) that the inner class should be qualified with outer class name.

method() should look like this:

    public void method(int num) {
        new Foo.Bar(num);
    }

[krzyk]

@davvd valid bug

[davvd]

@davvd valid bug

@krzyk I tagged this as "bug"

[krzyk]

@davvd this is postponed

[davvd]

@davvd this is postponed

@krzyk got it, "postponed" label here

[davvd]

@davvd this is postponed

@krzyk right, I will find someone else, no problem

[davvd]

@krzyk thanks a lot for reporting, 30 mins added to your acc, pmt ID 80002206

[krzyk]

@0crat in

[0crat]

@0crat in (here)

@krzyk Job #738 is now in scope, role is DEV

[0crat]

Bug was reported, see §29: +15 point(s) just awarded to @krzyk/z

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV are banned at this job; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV are banned at this job; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV are banned at this job; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV are banned at #738; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #738; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #738; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #738; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #738; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #738; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0pdd]

@krzyk the puzzle #1008 is still not solved.

[paulodamaso]

@krzyk Merged, please close.

[krzyk]

@paulodamaso thanks

[0crat]

@ypshenychka/z please review this job completed by @paulodamaso/z, as in §30; the job will be fully closed and all payments will be made when the quality review is completed

[0crat]

The job #738 is now out of scope

[ypshenychka]

@0crat quality good

[0crat]

@0crat quality good (here)

@ypshenychka The project doesn't have enough funds, can't make a payment

[0crat]

Order was finished, quality is "good": +35 point(s) just awarded to @paulodamaso/z

[0crat]

Quality review completed: +8 point(s) just awarded to @ypshenychka/z