refactor!: removed roomNameExists method

[abhinavkrin]

Proposed changes (including videos or screenshots)

Removed roomNameExists method as it has been replaced by rooms.nameExists endpoint

Issue(s)

Steps to test or reproduce

Further comments

CORE-351

[dionisio-bot]

Looks like this PR is not ready to merge, because of the following issues:

• This PR is missing the 'stat: QA assured' label

Please fix the issues and try again

If you have any trouble, please check the PR guidelines

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: f423b64

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 59.39%. Comparing base (8c447cf) to head (f423b64).
Report is 5 commits behind head on release-7.0.0.

Additional details and impacted files

@@              Coverage Diff               @@
##           release-7.0.0   #32484   +/-   ##
==============================================
  Coverage          59.39%   59.39%           
==============================================
  Files               2541     2541           
  Lines              63175    63175           
  Branches           14220    14220           
==============================================
  Hits               37525    37525           
  Misses             22935    22935           
  Partials            2715     2715           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit	76.02% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

[MarcosSpessatto]

Can we take a look at this test case? I think there's something weird since it's expecting an error when no room is found...

https://github.com/RocketChat/Rocket.Chat/blob/develop/apps/meteor/tests/end-to-end/api/09-rooms.js#L425

[abhinavkrin]

Can we take a look at this test case? I think there's something weird since it's expecting an error when no room is found...

https://github.com/RocketChat/Rocket.Chat/blob/develop/apps/meteor/tests/end-to-end/api/09-rooms.js#L425

I looked at it, the test was for an invalid roomId which should not be there as we dont accept a roomId for this endpoint.
So I changed this test to check for invalid params which makes the test more clear.
Also, I added a test to check if false is returned if roomName is not found.

The merge-base changed after approval.