refactor: Passing OpXxxx instead of content_type, cache_control,... in functions

[Xuanwo]

OpenDAL used to passing content_type, cache_control directly like the following:

pub fn azblob_put_blob_request(
    &self,
    path: &str,
    size: Option<u64>,
    content_type: Option<&str>,
    cache_control: Option<&str>,
    body: AsyncBody,
) -> Result<Request<AsyncBody>> {}

It's not good and hard to maintain, sometimes clippy will raising warning for our code. So it's time for us to migrate code like this to passing OpXxx. For example, we can change the previous code to:

pub fn azblob_put_blob_request(
    &self,
    path: &str,
    size: Option<u64>,
-   content_type: Option<&str>,
-   cache_control: Option<&str>,
+   args: &OpWrite,
    body: AsyncBody,
) -> Result<Request<AsyncBody>> {}

Tasks

• azblob feat(services/azblob): Rewrite the method signatures using OpWrite #3068
• azdls refactor(services/azdls): Use OpWrite instead of passing all args as parameters #3077
• cos feat(services/cos): Rewrite the method signatures using OpWrite #3070
• dropbox @ImSingee
• gcs refactor(services/gcs): Rewrite gcs methods signature by using OpXxxx #3087
• http refactor(services/http): Rewrite http methods signature by using OpRead/OpStat #3083
• obs feat(services/obs): Rewrite method signatures using OpWrite #3075
• onedrive feat(services/onedrive): Rewrite the method signatures using OpWrite #3091
• oss refactor(services/oss): Refactor oss_put_object signatures by using OpWrite #3080
• s3 feat(services/s3): Rewrite the method signatures using OpWrite #3078
• wasabi feat(services/wasabi): Rewrite the method signatures using OpRead,OpW… #3099
• webdav refactor(services/webdav): Refactor webdav_put signatures by using OpWrite. #3076
• webhdfs refactor(services/webhdfs): Rewrite webhdfs methods signature by using OpXxxx #3109

[cxorm]

Hi @Xuanwo ,
If you don't mind,
could I take this issue and I would take some time to investigate it?

[Xuanwo]

Could I take this issue and I would take some time to investigate it if you don't mind ?

How about selecting a service that allows others to work concurrently with you?

[cxorm]

Could I take this issue and I would take some time to investigate it if you don't mind ?

How about selecting a service that allows others to work concurrently with you?

Thank you for the reminder,
I want to do webhdfs first.

[Xuanwo]

I want to do webhdfs first.

Great, I have marked webhdfs for you. Have fun!

[miroim]

Hi, @Xuanwo
May I have a try the http.

[sunheyi6]

Hi,@Xuanwo
I want to s3

[Xuanwo]

@miroim & @sunheyi6, DONE.

[ImSingee]

So interesting form! I want to try dropbox

[acehinnnqru]

I want to try: azblob

[dqhl76]

I want to try: azblob

Cool, have fun!

[liul85]

Hi @Xuanwo I will take azdls

[sysu-yunz]

Can I have a chance to contribute? I want to try oss.

[acehinnnqru]

I want to try: azblob

I also done: cos

[hanxuanliang]

Hi, @Xuanwo
May I have a try the obs.

[poltao]

I want to try: gcs @Xuanwo

[laipz8200]

This doesn't look hard, I'm new to Rust, so could you let me try refactoring Webdav?

[Xuanwo]

This doesn't look hard, I'm new to Rust, so could you let me try refactoring Webdav?

Of course, have fun!

[Xuanwo]

Thank you all! It's my honor to work with you 🫶