feat(crosswalk): support crosswalk regulatory element

[satoshi-ota]

Description

Crosswalk module supports regulatory element.

See https://github.com/orgs/autowarefoundation/discussions/3036

Related links

⬇️ This PR must be merged before this PR.
autowarefoundation/autoware_common#187

Tests performed

• Can open lanelet map file includes crosswalk regulatory element.
• Crosswalk module works well on that map.
• PASS TIER IV INTERNAL SCENARIOS

Notes for reviewers

Crosswalk module checks the existence of regulatory elements.

Interface changes

Nothing.

Effects on system behavior

Nothing.

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

• I've confirmed the contribution guidelines.
• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.
• The PR has been properly tested.
• The PR has been reviewed by the code owners.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

• There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.
• The PR is ready for merge.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

[tkimura4]

It seems that the lanelet2_map_visualization node has not yet supported the crosswalk reguratory element.
Will you implement it in another PR?

[tkimura4]

The crosswalk module works well for crosswalk regulatory elements.

[tkimura4]

@satoshi-ota
In some cases, the shape of the crosswalk polygon seems to be strange. Could you check it?

[satoshi-ota]

@tkimura4 hmm... The map seems to be little bit wierd...? The crosswalk separates two lanelet. I guess that there is a special lane for bicycle.

[satoshi-ota]

It seems that the lanelet2_map_visualization node has not yet supported the crosswalk reguratory element. Will you implement it in another PR?

add crosswalk areas marker in 4c3a75c.

[tkimura4]

LGTM!

Review required

[kminoda]

LGTM

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 7.82% and project coverage change: -0.01 ⚠️

Comparison is base (f09e575) 14.45% compared to head (8258213) 14.44%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3939      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   14.45%   14.44%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1456     1456              
  Lines      102538   102611      +73     
  Branches    29652    29705      +53     
==========================================
+ Hits        14819    14824       +5     
- Misses      71568    71620      +52     
- Partials    16151    16167      +16     

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
differential	18.52% <7.82%> (?)
total	14.45% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️	Carriedforward from f09e575

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...et2_map_loader/lanelet2_map_visualization_node.cpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...th_planner/scene_module/lane_change/base_class.hpp	10.52% <ø> (ø)
...ath_planner/scene_module/lane_change/interface.hpp	50.00% <ø> (ø)
...nner/utils/lane_change/lane_change_module_data.hpp	50.00% <ø> (ø)
...or_path_planner/src/behavior_path_planner_node.cpp	18.64% <ø> (ø)
...planner/src/scene_module/lane_change/interface.cpp	14.55% <ø> (ø)
...cene_module/start_planner/start_planner_module.cpp	5.72% <ø> (+0.02%)	⬆️
planning/behavior_path_planner/src/utils/utils.cpp	17.12% <ø> (+0.02%)	⬆️
...behavior_velocity_crosswalk_module/src/manager.hpp	100.00% <ø> (ø)
..._velocity_crosswalk_module/src/scene_crosswalk.cpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 3 more

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.