Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(route_handler): support shoulder lane in getLeft(Right)Lanelet #4604

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 13, 2023

Conversation

kosuke55
Copy link
Contributor

@kosuke55 kosuke55 commented Aug 12, 2023

Description

support shoulder lane in getLeft(Right)Lanelet

Related links

Tests performed

psim

scenario test

Notes for reviewers

Interface changes

none

Effects on system behavior

none

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

  • The PR follows the pull request guidelines.
  • The PR has been properly tested.
  • The PR has been reviewed by the code owners.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

  • There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.
  • The PR is ready for merge.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the component:planning Route planning, decision-making, and navigation. (auto-assigned) label Aug 12, 2023
@kosuke55 kosuke55 added the tag:run-build-and-test-differential Mark to enable build-and-test-differential workflow. (used-by-ci) label Aug 12, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 12, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: -0.01% ⚠️

Comparison is base (2b7afb1) 14.84% compared to head (26a0b43) 14.83%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4604      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   14.84%   14.83%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1529     1529              
  Lines      105769   105807      +38     
  Branches    32221    32246      +25     
==========================================
  Hits        15698    15698              
- Misses      72913    72948      +35     
- Partials    17158    17161       +3     
Flag Coverage Δ *Carryforward flag
differential 15.77% <0.00%> (?)
total 14.84% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️ Carriedforward from 2b7afb1

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

Files Changed Coverage Δ
...ule/dynamic_avoidance/dynamic_avoidance_module.hpp 0.00% <ø> (ø)
...ule/dynamic_avoidance/dynamic_avoidance_module.cpp 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...ner/src/scene_module/dynamic_avoidance/manager.cpp 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
planning/route_handler/src/route_handler.cpp 24.67% <0.00%> (-0.22%) ⬇️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@kosuke55 kosuke55 merged commit d4782c4 into main Aug 13, 2023
37 of 41 checks passed
@kosuke55 kosuke55 deleted the feat/get_neighbor_shouler_lane branch August 13, 2023 04:21
kosuke55 added a commit to tier4/autoware.universe that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2023
LeoDriveProject pushed a commit to leo-drive/autoware.universe.golf that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2023
kminoda pushed a commit to kminoda/autoware.universe that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2023
kosuke55 added a commit to tier4/autoware.universe that referenced this pull request Aug 22, 2023
kosuke55 added a commit to tier4/autoware.universe that referenced this pull request Aug 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component:planning Route planning, decision-making, and navigation. (auto-assigned) tag:run-build-and-test-differential Mark to enable build-and-test-differential workflow. (used-by-ci)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants