Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update architeuthis to 0.3.1 #50970

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 26, 2024
Merged

Update architeuthis to 0.3.1 #50970

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 26, 2024

Conversation

BiocondaBot
Copy link
Collaborator

@BiocondaBot BiocondaBot commented Sep 26, 2024

Update architeuthis: 0.3.00.3.1

install with bioconda Conda

Info Link or Description
Recipe recipes/architeuthis (click to view/edit other files)
Summary Tool to analyze and summarize data for Kraken.
Home https://github.com/cdiener/architeuthis
Releases https://github.com/cdiener/architeuthis/tags
Recipe Maintainer(s) @cdiener
Author @cdiener

This pull request was automatically generated (see docs).

@BiocondaBot BiocondaBot added autobump Automatic Version Update new version labels Sep 26, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 26, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the meta.yaml file for the architeuthis package. It increments the version from "0.3.0" to "0.3.1", updates the SHA256 checksum for the source tarball, and changes the build number from 1 to 0. The build script remains unchanged, continuing to use the Go build command with specific flags.

Changes

File Change Summary
recipes/architeuthis/meta.yaml Version updated from "0.3.0" to "0.3.1"; SHA256 checksum updated; build number changed from 1 to 0.

Sequence Diagram(s)

(No sequence diagram generated as the changes are straightforward and do not involve complex interactions.)

Poem

In the code where changes dance,
A version hops, a new romance.
From "0.3.0" to "0.3.1",
With checksums fresh, the work is done!
Build number shifts, a leap so spry,
Hooray for updates, oh my, oh my! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d6403ea and 0c5004a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • recipes/architeuthis/meta.yaml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
recipes/architeuthis/meta.yaml (4)

2-2: Version update looks good.

The version has been correctly updated from 0.3.0 to 0.3.1, which aligns with the PR objective and follows semantic versioning for a patch update.


13-13: Build number reset is correct.

The build number has been appropriately reset to 0 for the new version. This is the correct practice when updating to a new version in Bioconda recipes.


Line range hint 1-54: Overall changes are consistent with PR objectives.

The changes in this file accurately reflect the update of architeuthis from version 0.3.0 to 0.3.1. The version, sha256 checksum, and build number have been updated appropriately. The rest of the file, including build instructions and metadata, remains unchanged and consistent with the package requirements.

A few points to note:

  1. The run_exports section ensures proper version pinning when this package is used as a dependency.
  2. The build script uses Go, which is appropriate for this project.
  3. The recipe maintainer (@cdiener) listed in the file matches the information provided in the PR objectives.

These changes align well with the stated PR objectives of updating the architeuthis package to version 0.3.1.

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token

(syntax)


10-10: Verify the sha256 checksum.

The sha256 checksum has been updated, which is expected for a new version. However, it's crucial to ensure that this checksum corresponds to the correct source tarball for version 0.3.1.

Run the following script to verify the checksum:


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@BiocondaBot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

No artifacts found on the most recent builds. Either the builds failed, the artifacts have been removed due to age, or the recipe was blacklisted/skipped.

2 similar comments
@BiocondaBot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

No artifacts found on the most recent builds. Either the builds failed, the artifacts have been removed due to age, or the recipe was blacklisted/skipped.

@BiocondaBot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

No artifacts found on the most recent builds. Either the builds failed, the artifacts have been removed due to age, or the recipe was blacklisted/skipped.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
autobump Automatic Version Update new version
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants