Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update giatools to 0.3 #51004

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 27, 2024
Merged

Update giatools to 0.3 #51004

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 27, 2024

Conversation

BiocondaBot
Copy link
Collaborator

@BiocondaBot BiocondaBot commented Sep 27, 2024

Update giatools: 0.20.3

install with bioconda Conda

Info Link or Description
Recipe recipes/giatools (click to view/edit other files)
Summary Tools required for Galaxy Image Analysis
Home https://github.com/BMCV/giatools
Releases https://github.com/BMCV/giatools/tags
Recipe Maintainer(s) @kostrykin
Author @BMCV

This pull request was automatically generated (see docs).

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Updated the giatools package to version 0.3, providing users with the latest enhancements and fixes.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Updated source URL and checksum to ensure users access the correct and verified package content.

@BiocondaBot BiocondaBot added autobump Automatic Version Update new version labels Sep 27, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 27, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the meta.yaml file for the giatools package. The version has been changed from "0.2" to "0.3", and the source URL has been updated to point to the new version's download link. Additionally, the SHA256 checksum has been modified to reflect the new source archive, indicating that the package content has changed.

Changes

File Change Summary
recipes/giatools/meta.yaml - Version updated from "0.2" to "0.3".
- Source URL changed from 0.2.zip to 0.3.zip.
- SHA256 checksum updated to a new value.

Possibly related PRs


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e913e2f and a600c04.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • recipes/giatools/meta.yaml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
recipes/giatools/meta.yaml (4)

2-2: Version update looks good.

The version number has been correctly updated from "0.2" to "0.3", which aligns with the PR objectives.


9-9: Source URL update is correct.

The source URL has been properly updated to reflect the new version (0.3). The use of the {{ version }} variable ensures consistency with the version specified earlier in the file.


Line range hint 12-45: Verify unchanged sections for potential updates.

While the following sections remain unchanged, please verify if any updates are needed for the new version:

  1. Build section: Ensure the build number is reset to 0 for the new version.
  2. Requirements: Confirm that the Python version constraint (>=3.8,<3.12) and other dependencies are still appropriate for version 0.3.
  3. Test command: Verify that giatools.VERSION will correctly output the new version number.
  4. About section: Check if any updates to the summary or other metadata are needed.

To assist with this verification, you can run the following commands:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify version consistency and check for any needed updates

# Check giatools version consistency
echo "Checking giatools version consistency:"
grep -n 'version' recipes/giatools/meta.yaml

# List requirements
echo -e "\nListing requirements:"
sed -n '/requirements:/,/test:/p' recipes/giatools/meta.yaml

# Check test command
echo -e "\nChecking test command:"
grep -n 'python -c' recipes/giatools/meta.yaml

# Display about section
echo -e "\nDisplaying about section:"
sed -n '/about:/,/extra:/p' recipes/giatools/meta.yaml
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token

(syntax)


10-10: Verify the SHA256 checksum.

The SHA256 checksum has been updated, which is expected with a new version. However, it's crucial to verify that this checksum is correct for the new version of the package.

Run the following script to verify the SHA256 checksum:


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@BiocondaBot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

No artifacts found on the most recent builds. Either the builds failed, the artifacts have been removed due to age, or the recipe was blacklisted/skipped.

2 similar comments
@BiocondaBot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

No artifacts found on the most recent builds. Either the builds failed, the artifacts have been removed due to age, or the recipe was blacklisted/skipped.

@BiocondaBot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

No artifacts found on the most recent builds. Either the builds failed, the artifacts have been removed due to age, or the recipe was blacklisted/skipped.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
autobump Automatic Version Update new version
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants