-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Milestone of Partition Table in Sprint3 (2021/4/19 ~ 2021/6/18) #24150
Comments
we also need to fix the existing bugs, like #20372 |
OK, I'll go through all existed issues about the partition table add them here later. |
|
There is bug #24171 here that prevents |
#22408 mentioned that there might be performance and resource issues in backup scenario, please take a look |
we need to add compatibility tests with other components in the cluster, for example: TiFlash MPP, BR, Dumpling, Lightning, Binlog, TiCDC |
Actually there are many updates after the proposal you mentioned. Here is a simple doc that may help you track the current progress. I think we will sort out and update some documents about partition table after finishing this milestone. |
Thanks! I'll try to take a look when I stage my current works. FYI when I refer to this project in our developer discussion forum(https://internals.tidb.io/t/topic/97/2), I said
Please confirm whether it is precise and I'll appreciate it if you can reply on the forum topic. |
Development Task
Development plan:
Brief introduction: improve the quality of all experimental features of partition tables, including direct reading, global statistics, list, and column list partition.
All test cases are in the GA matrix document.
Work items:
IndexLookUpReader
support reading partition table directly #24197TableReader
directly when accessing TiFlash partition table instead of usingPartitionTableExec
UseTableReader
directly when accessing TiFlash partition table instead of usingPartitionTableExec
#24343 executor: Use TableReader directly when accessing TiFlash partition table instead of using PartitionTableExec #24344UnionScan
support direct reading and remove all code aboutPartitionTableExec
remove all code about PartitionTableExec #24393 executor: solve the compatibility problem between UnionScan and partition tables and remove all code about PartitionTableExec #24394BatchGet
andPointGet
Order
+Limit
IndexLookUpJoin
BatchGet
andPointGet
for hash partitionBatchGet
andPointGet
for range partitionOrder
+Limit
IndexLookUpJoin
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: