-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
sessionctx/variable: refine slow log output by not print useless info #12016
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #12016 +/- ##
================================================
+ Coverage 81.2963% 81.4652% +0.1688%
================================================
Files 451 451
Lines 96671 97379 +708
================================================
+ Hits 78590 79330 +740
+ Misses 12445 12400 -45
- Partials 5636 5649 +13 |
Could we keep the |
@shenli, Of course, Done. |
@qw4990 PTAL |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
SlowLogCopWaitP90, SlowLogSpaceMarkStr, logItems.CopTasks.P90WaitTime.Seconds(), | ||
SlowLogCopWaitMax, SlowLogSpaceMarkStr, logItems.CopTasks.MaxWaitTime.Seconds(), | ||
SlowLogCopWaitAddr, SlowLogSpaceMarkStr, logItems.CopTasks.MaxWaitAddress) + "\n") | ||
if logItems.CopTasks.NumCopTasks > 0 { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if NumCopTasks == 1
, we only need to print SlowLogCopProcAvg
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Cop_wait_avg
, cop_proc_addr
also need?
done.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Your auto merge job has been accepted, waiting for #12094 |
cherry pick to release-3.0 in PR #12144 |
cherry pick to release-2.1 failed |
It seems that, not for sure, we failed to cherry-pick this commit to release-2.1. Please comment '/run-cherry-picker' to try to trigger the cherry-picker if we did fail to cherry-pick this commit before. @crazycs520 PTAL. |
What problem does this PR solve?
What is changed and how it works
No need to print cop info when there is no cop task.
eg:
As you can see,
Num_cop_tasks
is 0, then the cop log is redundant.