Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

executor: fix unexpected NotNullFlag in case when expr ret type #23102

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Mar 5, 2021

Conversation

guo-shaoge
Copy link
Collaborator

Signed-off-by: guo-shaoge [email protected]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #23036

Problem Summary:

drop table if exists t1;
create table t1(c1 int not null);
insert into t1 values(1);
select (case when null then c1 end) is null from t1;

Output should be empty set, but TiDB output "1". Because when we fold constant for IsNull expr, optimizer found the result type of CaseWhen expr has NotNullFlag, which is unexpected. So rewriter return false directly

What is changed and how it works?

What's Changed:

  1. Erase NotNullFlag from the result type of CaseWhen expr. Because we don't know will any when clause be true until runtime.
  2. make types.setTypeFlag() public. (types.setTypeFlag() -> types.SetTypeFlag())

Related changes

  • Need to cherry-pick to the release branch

Check List

Tests

  • Integration test: Add cases in expression.TestBuiltin()

Side effects: no

Release note

  • fix unexpected NotNullFlag in case when expr ret type

@guo-shaoge guo-shaoge requested a review from a team as a code owner March 4, 2021 07:25
@guo-shaoge guo-shaoge requested review from lzmhhh123 and removed request for a team March 4, 2021 07:25
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 4, 2021
Signed-off-by: guo-shaoge <[email protected]>
@ichn-hu ichn-hu mentioned this pull request Mar 4, 2021
@guo-shaoge
Copy link
Collaborator Author

PTAL @lzmhhh123

@XuHuaiyu XuHuaiyu added the sig/planner SIG: Planner label Mar 5, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@XuHuaiyu XuHuaiyu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@XuHuaiyu: Please use /LGTM instead of LGTM when you want to approve the pull request by comment.
If you use the GitHub review feature, please approve the PR directly, the comment will not take effect in the GitHub review feature.
If you have any qustions please refer to lgtm command help or lgtm plugin design.

If you have approved this PR, please ignore this reply. This reply is being used as a temporary reply during the migration of the new bot and will be removed on April 1.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@qw4990
Copy link
Contributor

qw4990 commented Mar 5, 2021

/LGTM

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Mar 5, 2021
@XuHuaiyu
Copy link
Contributor

XuHuaiyu commented Mar 5, 2021

/LGTM

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • XuHuaiyu
  • qw4990

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by writing /lgtm in a comment.
Reviewer can cancel approval by writing /lgtm cancel in a comment.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Mar 5, 2021
@XuHuaiyu
Copy link
Contributor

XuHuaiyu commented Mar 5, 2021

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@XuHuaiyu: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

You only need to trigger /merge once, and if the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: faadae1

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Mar 5, 2021
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit e83a8f6 into pingcap:master Mar 5, 2021
ti-srebot pushed a commit to ti-srebot/tidb that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2021
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

cherry pick to release-4.0 in PR #23135

@AilinKid
Copy link
Contributor

/run-cherry-picker

ti-srebot pushed a commit to ti-srebot/tidb that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2021
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

cherry pick to release-5.0-rc in PR #23340

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component/expression sig/planner SIG: Planner size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. type/bugfix This PR fixes a bug.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

The expression of "case when" on clustered_index table get wrong result
6 participants