…ntation

…multi_factory

feat(smgp): implements eth_call exchange rate provider

…bstract provider

Adding new Web Provider

feat(stableMinGasPrice): refactoring

…kout

In order to implement the verification of initcode size, necessary for the RSKIP438,
we need the constant value with the max allowed value. So we can start to validate
and use it on the logic of the verification

In order to have the RIT tests working as we have it today, we need to add triggers for
every commit and for when the PR is opened, but only for masters and *-rc branches base branches.

* Initial constants and config for the max initcode size

In order to implement the verification of initcode size, necessary for the RSKIP438,
we need the constant value with the max allowed value. So we can start to validate
and use it on the logic of the verification

- Adding scenarios of test for the contract creation with DSL
- The validation for the initCode size test was added
- The validation is based on the RSKIP that enables it
- Validation added for the contractCreation during transaction execution

Finished the implementation of transactionCost and initcode size validation

- All the logic related with transaction cost was changed to meet the new cost criteria
- More tests were added to be sure that the flow is following the RSKIP438
- Tests were added to validate that this cost and validation doesn't impact before reach the activation height

Applied some suggestions from review

Adding tests to validate the failure if we don't have enough gas to cover initCode

* Refactor from the Initcode cost calculation

In order to have the exact same logic for the initcode cost calculation,
we introduced some new classes that can be easily reused by the TransactionExecutor and VM classes. This way, if this logic change, we won't have to change the code in multiple places.

It was also introduced an interface for it, so we can expand this idea and
in the future, be able to calculate total transactions just calling a method
to calculate it independent of the logic used.

* Applying some more suggestions from review

Co-Authored-By: Nazaret García Revetria <[email protected]>
Co-Authored-By: Vovchyk <[email protected]>

* Initial constants and config for the max initcode size

In order to implement the verification of initcode size, necessary for the RSKIP438,
we need the constant value with the max allowed value. So we can start to validate
and use it on the logic of the verification

- Adding scenarios of test for the contract creation with DSL
- The validation for the initCode size test was added
- The validation is based on the RSKIP that enables it
- Validation added for the contractCreation during transaction execution

Finished the implementation of transactionCost and initcode size validation

- All the logic related with transaction cost was changed to meet the new cost criteria
- More tests were added to be sure that the flow is following the RSKIP438
- Tests were added to validate that this cost and validation doesn't impact before reach the activation height

Applied some suggestions from review

Adding tests to validate the failure if we don't have enough gas to cover initCode

* Refactor from the Initcode cost calculation

In order to have the exact same logic for the initcode cost calculation,
we introduced some new classes that can be easily reused by the TransactionExecutor and VM classes. This way, if this logic change, we won't have to change the code in multiple places.

It was also introduced an interface for it, so we can expand this idea and
in the future, be able to calculate total transactions just calling a method
to calculate it independent of the logic used.

* Applying some more suggestions from review

Co-Authored-By: Nazaret García Revetria <[email protected]>
Co-Authored-By: Vovchyk <[email protected]>

…ksmart/rskj into feature/introduce_initcode_size_limit

Using the default branch set on the inputs from workflow dispatch would be a better re-use.

This reverts commit c42b470.

…ion_tests_workflow

Adding Rootstock Integration Tests workflow

… one in mainnet

…er case

master -> feature/include_stable_minGasPrice_provider merge

Refactor Bridge related tests

Remove unused import

Remove mistaken reason

Minor refactor

Make flyover rs builder receive a keccak256 hash instead of sha256 one

Refactors

…o RedeemScriptCreationException

Issues fixed:
1 - Remove the trigger on push for master  and *-rc -> we don't need that
anymore since we are running it for every commit on PRs against these branches.

2 - Solve the issue that the status of an execution triggered via workflow doesn't update the PR status.
 And if we need to use a different branch for RIT, Powpeg and RIT in the PR, it won't change the status to
 green after the workflow_dispatch execution -> We will do that adding a parsing on the description, looking
 for the branch that need to be used for that PR. If there is no branch configured on the description, we will
 try to use the default one.

Create a flyover redeem script builder

…rice_provider

Configurable Fiat-Based Stable MinGasPrice

Co-authored-by: Lucas <[email protected]>

…e_limit

Initial constants and config for the max initcode size

Co-authored-by: Lucas <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: Lucas <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: Lucas <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: Lucas <[email protected]>

Fixing some issues on RIT workflow

…-fix

fix(MaxInitcodeSize): fix NPE in transactionCost() method

build: bump jackson version

chore: increase min supported java version to 17