Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix deprecated hash methods #254

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 12, 2016
Merged

fix deprecated hash methods #254

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 12, 2016

Conversation

mynameisrufus
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ def pdu_type= t
end

def error_status= es
unless ErrorStatusCodes.has_key?(es)
unless ErrorStatusCodes.key?(es)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Today I learned ;)

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

me too, thanks!

jch added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2016
@jch jch merged commit 15049c5 into ruby-ldap:master Jan 12, 2016
jsonn pushed a commit to jsonn/pkgsrc that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2016
=== Net::LDAP 0.14.0

* Normalize the encryption parameter passed to the LDAP constructor {#264}[ruby-ldap/ruby-net-ldap#264]
* Update Docs: Net::LDAP now requires ruby >= 2 {#261}[ruby-ldap/ruby-net-ldap#261]
* fix symbol proc {#255}[ruby-ldap/ruby-net-ldap#255]
* fix trailing commas {#256}[ruby-ldap/ruby-net-ldap#256]
* fix deprecated hash methods {#254}[ruby-ldap/ruby-net-ldap#254]
* fix space after comma {#253}[ruby-ldap/ruby-net-ldap#253]
* fix space inside brackets {#252}[ruby-ldap/ruby-net-ldap#252]
* Rubocop style fixes {#249}[ruby-ldap/ruby-net-ldap#249]
* Lazy initialize Net::LDAP::Connection's internal socket {#235}[ruby-ldap/ruby-net-ldap#235]
* Support for rfc3062 Password Modify, closes #163 {#178}[ruby-ldap/ruby-net-ldap#178]
This was referenced Jan 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants