Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

check_stability.py is too verbose #11454

Closed
foolip opened this issue Jun 11, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

check_stability.py is too verbose #11454

foolip opened this issue Jun 11, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@foolip
Copy link
Member

foolip commented Jun 11, 2018

After #10988 it looks like the stability jobs are more verbose. https://travis-ci.org/web-platform-tests/wpt/jobs/389217237 (for #11301) is an example of this, where the raw log ends with "Log reached capacity (3145728 bytes); output disabled" during "Repetition 8 / 10".

The job failed, and it's not possible to tell why.

@foolip
Copy link
Member Author

foolip commented Jun 11, 2018

This affected #11333 too. There the log ended like this:

Log reached capacity (3145728 bytes); output disabled.


No output has been received in the last 10m0s, this potentially indicates a stalled build or something wrong with the build itself.
Check the details on how to adjust your build configuration on: https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/common-build-problems/#Build-times-out-because-no-output-was-received

The build has been terminated

And only in "Repetition 4 / 10", so the verbosity has to be at least halved to fix this.

gsnedders added a commit to gsnedders/web-platform-tests that referenced this issue Jun 11, 2018
…heck_stability.py

I'm not entirely sure why web-platform-tests#10988 made this default to on, given that
was a change of behaviour from before, so let's turn it back off
given it's causing breakage, as documented in web-platform-tests#11454.
@gsnedders gsnedders self-assigned this Jun 11, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants