Switch data ice-shelf melt rates to Paolo et al 2023

[xylar]

This data set is an Antarctic melt-rate climatology covering the years 1992-2017.

The new datasets is an improvement because:

• it is more accurate than the previous Adusumilli et al. (2020)
• it includes rerouting of fluxes that are not under ice shelves in the MPAS-Ocean mesh
• the fluxes are carefully renormalized so that the total flux is identical to the original Paolo et al. dataset
• fixes the sign of the heat flux (see Fix the sign of the heat flux for DISMF MPAS-Dev/compass#781)

E3SM-Ocean-Discussion#78 contains a small amount of relevant discussion. The new dataset was created in Compass following MPAS-Dev/compass#778.

[non-BFB] only for current configurations with DISMF

[xylar]

This PR is expected to be bit-for-bit for all current test configurations. It will be non-BFB for the DISMF test added in #6229 if that were to get merged before this PR.

[xylar]

Testing

@darincomeau ran a 5-year B-case with these changes. Analysis from that run are here:
https://web.lcrc.anl.gov/public/e3sm/diagnostic_output/ac.xylar/analysis/20240223.v3.LR.CRYO1850-DISMF.paolo.chrysalis/

The results show the expected melt rates and melt fluxes, as discussed in MPAS-Dev/MPAS-Analysis#987.

[cbegeman]

Approving based on review and testing in E3SM-Ocean-Discussion#78 and MPAS-Dev/compass#778.

[darincomeau]

Approved based on testing.

It's the SMS_D_Ld1.ne30pg2_r05_IcoswISC30E3r5.CRYO1850-DISMF test that will be non-BFB, added in #6221.

[darincomeau]

Simulation using new DISMF file is running here
/lcrc/group/acme/ac.dcomeau/E3SMv3/20240227.v3.LR.CRYO1850-DISMF.paolo.chrysalis

[xylar]

MPAS-Analysis results for a 10 year B-case are here:
https://web.lcrc.anl.gov/public/e3sm/diagnostic_output/ac.xylar/analysis/20240227.v3.LR.CRYO1850-DISMF.paolo.chrysalis/yrs_01-10/

[jonbob]

@xylar -- I don't think we expect this to be BFB for current tests with DISMF?

[darincomeau]

@jonbob yes, I noted the test expected to be non-BFB above, so I guess we should change the BFB tag?

[jonbob]

Thanks @darincomeau -- I missed that! But I'll change the BFB flag and add something to the PR description

[jonbob]

Passes:

• SMS_Ld1.T62_oQU240wLI.GMPAS-IAF-DISMF.chrysalis_intel (dataset not changed for this resolution)
• ERS_Ld5.T62_oQU120.CMPASO-NYF.chrysalis_intel

merged to next

[jonbob]

The only test this PR should impact is already failing on chrysalis, since it specifies debug:

SMS_D_Ld1.ne30pg2_r05_IcoswISC30E3r5.CRYO1850-DISMF.chrysalis_intel

This test also runs on pm-cpu and currently passes, so we'll expect it to have DIFFs

[jonbob]

merged to master and expected DIFFs blessed

[xylar]

Thank you @jonbob! This is a really nice addition to have.

Thanks @darincomeau and @cbegeman for your reviews and other help on this work!