Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[HAMMER] Update i18n catalog for hammer #18040

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 9, 2018

Conversation

@miq-bot miq-bot changed the title Update i18n catalog for hammer [HAMMER] Update i18n catalog for hammer Oct 1, 2018
@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Oct 1, 2018

Checked commits mzazrivec/manageiq@e8ab261~...f2c6c7e with ruby 2.3.3, rubocop 0.52.1, haml-lint 0.20.0, and yamllint 1.10.0
0 files checked, 0 offenses detected
Everything looks fine. 👍

@carbonin
Copy link
Member

carbonin commented Oct 4, 2018

It looks like a spec related to gettext is failing here. I don't know too much about it, could you take a look @mzazrivec ?

@simaishi
Copy link
Contributor

simaishi commented Oct 5, 2018

Travis failure:

  1) placeholders gettext strings do not contain interpolations
     Failure/Error: expect(errors).to be_empty
       expected `["\"Cancel operation is not supported for \#{self.class.name}\""].empty?` to return true, got false
     Shared Example Group: :placeholders called from ./spec/i18n/placeholders_spec.rb:2
     # ./spec/shared/i18n/placeholders.rb:49:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'

@mzazrivec
Copy link
Contributor Author

CI fix: #18067

@mzazrivec mzazrivec force-pushed the update_i18n_catalog_for_hammer branch from f2c6c7e to 30d30cc Compare October 8, 2018 13:25
@simaishi simaishi merged commit 1c8bf5d into ManageIQ:hammer Oct 9, 2018
@simaishi simaishi added this to the Sprint 97 Ending Oct 22, 2018 milestone Oct 9, 2018
@mzazrivec mzazrivec deleted the update_i18n_catalog_for_hammer branch October 10, 2018 07:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants