-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Status of testing of Apache Airflow 2.5.2rc2 #30028
Comments
how should I report? |
@pierrejeambrun what is the best way to test this? |
@auvipy you can directly report in this issue your findings. And if the change (PR) you tested is working as expected or not. (Or any other issue you noticed in the release candidate) @amoghrajesh The easiest way is to install the release candidate in a fresh virtualenv, then run airflow in standalone mode and test changes there. (If you have a dev environment for airflow you can also upgrade there and see if everything is working as expected) |
#29410 is still looking good. We did see an unrelated issue from #29821 but that seems to be a user error on our end that we need to correct. Thank you @hussein-awala for that fix! |
#29756 looks good on the RC build. Performed small multiple tests, one snippet attached to this comment. @pierrejeambrun RC_testing.mov |
To be continued (have to hurry now) |
rather than exit 1 and:
|
All looks good for my fixes - except the two issues where it "looks" good but I cannot test it easily and I would love to get confirmation :) |
I've checked #29054. It works fine. |
Tested #29791 in the |
Tested #29860 in breeze after pulling the 2.5.2rc1 tag, looks like it works as expected. Tried to create a DAGRun from an inactive DAG, and got a 404 rather than a 500:
|
A bug was found in rc1 that necessitate an rc2 (constraints). I think we can safely assume that what was tested for rc1 is still working in rc2. Feel free to do more testing. The issue has been updated to target 2.5.2rc2 |
Tested #29454 in |
Tested #29056 (minor fix for handling error on cluster policy itself) and looks good. But i think it's better to use
could I modify this line now?
|
Thanks to everyone that helped testing Closing as |
🎉 Thanks for organizing @pierrejeambrun! |
We have a kind request for all the contributors to the latest Apache Airflow RC 2.5.2rc2.
Could you please help us to test the RC versions of Airflow?
Please let us know in the comment if the issue is addressed in the latest RC.
pytest
(#28204): @potiuk @TaragolisLinked issues:
pytest
(#28177)pytest
(#28177)" (#28196)Linked issues:
airflow connections add
(#28922): @TaragolisLinked issues:
pytest
(#29086): @auvipyLinked issues:
Linked issues:
Linked issues:
note
in payload (#28825)Linked issues:
Linked issues:
prev_logical_date
variable offset-aware (#29454): @akravaLinked issues:
Linked issues:
Linked issues:
Linked issues:
Linked issues:
Linked issues:
Linked issues:
Linked issues:
Linked issues:
importlib-metadata
backport to< 5.0.0
(Limit importlib-metadata backport to < 5.0.0 #29924, Also limit importlib on Python 3.9 #30069) @potiukThanks to all who contributed to the release (probably not a complete list!):
@Gollum999 @snjypl @auvipy @amoghrajesh @antonio-antuan @bharat99k @vchiapaikeo @SamWheating @jose-workpath @tseruga @akrava @Josersanvil @Thomas-McKanna @ashb @SoxMax @bdsoha @vedantlodha @lewijw @hussein-awala @arjunanan6 @dependabot[bot] @yangguoaws @kaxil @Limess @surabathini @jedcunningham @dstandish @pshrivastava27 @ecerulm @ttben @casra-developers @josh-fell @duke8585 @ephraimbuddy @michaelmicheal @farhan0syakir @okayhooni @lorenzomagni @bbovenzi @kolfild26 @potiuk @aliotta @alejandrofm @cosinequanon @enriqueayala @uranusjr @vincbeck @Taragolis
Committer
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: